Friday, January 23, 2009

年青會計師無路可退 (作者: 龔耀輝)

  會計師在各種專業當中,相當特別,是唯一出現所謂part-time的執業情況。甚少見過兼職律師(立法會議員除外)、兼職醫生(相信沒有人會膽敢找他們開刀)、兼職牙醫(較兼職醫生更恐怖),又或者兼職工程師(正職又會是什麼?)唯獨是會計師,有兼職情況出現。

  外人未必知道,會計師其實有兩種,執業與非執業,分別在於執業會計師可以簽核數報告,只此而矣。而執業會計師手上持有一張執業證書,行內稱之為PC。

  兼職會計師,通常是自己有一份正職,每年可能幫熟人簽一、兩份核數報告。這類手持PC,但沒有正式掛牌開檔的會計師,大有人在,不乏社會上知名人士。

兼職是邁向自僱過渡安排

  如何看待這批兼職會計師?正式開檔的,當然希望全面取締。「多隻香爐多隻鬼」,就算兼職會計師簽的是微型公司的核數報告,都是跟自己爭生意。況且,正式開檔的,有燈油火蠟,又人工又舖租,十分「重皮」。兼職執業,一面有糧出,一面賺外快,超爽。在正式執業掛牌的會計師眼中,兼職會計師是除之而後快。

  另一個角度,從兼職者心態,又不同世界。一張PC旁身,可能只不過是後着。今時今日,只有特首份工最穩陣,以防2012的特首無法順利過渡2017。其他打工仔,人人自危,假如有日不幸被炒,起碼可以靠一張PC自己開檔,自食其力。而且,正常地由打工變成自己開檔,例子經常可見。而觸發夠膽自立門戶,就是靠兼職時候慢慢儲下來的客源。兼職,可以是一個邁向自僱的過渡安排。

留意三項影響變化

  如果從年青會計師的角度,一張PC可能更加彌足珍貴。今時不同往日,找尋優差困難,工作毫無保障,隨時要自己下海從商,自己開檔。如果將簽發PC的門檻提升,同時「封殺」手持一張PC作為危急退路的機會,最大影響的,是現在還未企穩陣腳的年青會計師。

  會計師公會最近提議修訂PC的簽發,年青會計師相信沒有閒情逸緻慢慢研究。就讓我代勞,為你指出幾項對你們最有影響的變化:  第一、在大陸工作的經驗都可以用作申請PC,對你是好事。但另一方面,理論上內地人都可以借此機會申請PC,跟你爭飯碗。不過,少擔心,內地會計師對香港會計師這資格,沒有多大興趣。

  第二、以前離開會計師行兩年,仍有機會申請PC。將來,離開一年後,可能就喪失資格。換言之,如果你跳入Commercial一年後被炒,你未必可以申請PC自食其力。

  第三、正如以上所說,有正職而又沒有開一個字號,將來你無法申請PC。以往的商界前輩,可以為自己留一條後路。今天,你是沒有退路。一入Commercial,難以回頭。

  其實,兼職會計師並非洪水猛獸。香港有大量公司,其實沒有什麼真正生意,對社會無害,不會衍生雷曼苦主,但法律所限,又要每年核數,例如專門持有物業的有限公司。兼職會計師,通常只會簽一些超級簡單的核數報告,複雜的亦應付不來。要數會計師害群之馬,排隊未數到這批兼職人士,反而大行密密見報。如果減低會計師申請PC的機會及數量,又無助提升會計師的執業水平,可苦?

  提升執業水平,會計師公會責無旁貸,但要做得其法。年青會計師們受影響較深,你們要幫自己出聲。別以為諮詢過程多說無用,這類改制要在會員大會表決通過。最後是否成事,還要看你。如有意見,可電郵至events@hkyaa.org,讓我們為你綜合處理。

  (作者為香港會計師公會理事。本文內容純屬作者個人意見,與公會毫無關係,亦不代表公會立場)

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

謝謝龔生資料﹐自從香港會計師公會與ACCA 離婚之後﹐動作多﹐貢獻零﹐真可悲。

Anonymous said...

Before I give out comment, I must declare that I am the CPA quoted by Mr. Gong working as full time accountant in commercial sector while having a PC for practice.

As provided in the consultation paper, the move to eliminate part-time practitioners is to promote the international status of HKICPA and maintain the quality of CPA. Sorry, I can't see points here!

I consider the very first step that the Institute has to educate the public not to hire those 'middle-men' who are not qualified accountant but they represent to customers that they are in capacity to do the bookkeeping as well as audit.

No matter whether CPAs are practising on FT or PT, the Institue should give measure to our members so that we can develop the CPA at an environment that facilitate growth of practice at a lower costs and threshold such as reducing PC registration fees and for FT practitioners, the Institute should allow full time practice while having a full time job as well. In fact, some HK lawyers are doing in-house counsel as well as practising as full-time solicitors. It is quite common!

Those CPA firms having listed companies clients, in fact, post serious threat to the reputation of the HKICPA rather than the small one. The Institute should take more measures and efforts in regulating these type of accounting firms. It's simply because any failures catch the public's attention easily.

I hereby ask FT and PT CPA to voice out! We have tried very best to earn a living either in FT or PT. We should express our own view!

Anonymous said...

Part-time Practitioner and 會計佬:

Thank you all for your precious comments. To gather force and give more pressure to the Institute, we need both your voice and support. Would you be able to leave us your name and contact detail so that we can call upon your support when we have future activities on this issue?

You may send e-mail to YAA e-mail or my personal e-mail at hcfma2007@gmail.com.

Best regards,

Horace Ma
CEO of YAA